Blood collection tube and anticoagulant influence on SARS-CoV-2 antibody and avidity levels

Nicholas C. Castro, Jimmie Bullock, Katarzyna Haynesworth, Sarah Loftus, Jordan Metz, Hayley North,Troy J. Kemp,Ligia A. Pinto

Heliyon(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
SARS-CoV-2 serology plays a crucial role in assessing COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity and antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Tube type and anticoagulant may influence serology results. Thus, understanding the influence of these variables in test results is key.We evaluated the influence of serum collection tube type and anticoagulant on anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody levels detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and Luminex multiplex assays (11-plex) in serum and plasma samples. Anti-spike IgG avidity was also evaluated in both sample types.No significant differences were found between serology assay results using different blood (serum) collection tube types. However, significantly lower antibody concentrations (p < 0.05) were observed in tubes with the anticoagulants sodium citrate and acid citrate dextrose (ACD) in the ELISA and Multiplex assays (n = 29), compared to expected concentrations. These differences mostly disappeared after adjusting for the dilution factor caused by the anticoagulant volume, indicating that anticoagulant does not significantly impact the assay results, while anticoagulant volume does.There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in IgG avidity (M) of plasma samples (p < 0.05) compared to serum, but anticoagulant type had no effect.Overall, these findings indicate that the choice of collection tube may introduce subtle variations in assay results if the volumes of anticoagulants are not taken into consideration. Additionally, differences between serum and anticoagulant-treated plasma matrices were observed in avidity ELISAs, indicating that these samples are not interchangeable for these assays; a finding that requires further investigation.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要