Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Efficacy and Safety of Tebentafusp in Patients with Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics(2024)

Cited 0|Views1
No score
Abstract
Patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) have a poor prognosis, and few appropriate medications are available. Tebentafusp is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for mUM recently. However, the real efficacy and safety of tebentafusp are still unclear. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to March 20, 2024. The research was reported based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. We used random effects models to aggregate data on the response rates and adverse events of tebentafusp therapy. Six studies met the inclusion criteria with a total sample of 589 participants. The pooled objective response rate was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.05–0.12), and pooled disease control rate was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.44–0.57). The overall incidence was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95–1.00) for any grade adverse events, 0.50 (95% CI: 0.41–0.59) for grade 3–4 adverse events, and 0.01 (95% CI: 0–0.03) for discontinuation due to adverse events. Tebentafusp exhibits promising treatment outcomes for mUM patients. Although accompanied with a common occurrence of adverse events, which can typically be managed and controlled. Future research is necessary for substantiating these findings and refining guidelines for management of mUM.
More
Translated text
Key words
Tebentafusp,metastatic uveal melanoma,safety,efficacy,meta-analysis
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined