Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

3D-CEUS/MRI–CEUS fusion imaging vs 2D-CEUS after locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter prospective study of therapeutic response evaluation

European Radiology(2024)

Cited 0|Views3
No score
Abstract
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3D contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)/MRI–CEUS fusion imaging with 2D-CEUS in assessing the response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to locoregional therapies in a multicenter prospective study. A consecutive series of patients with HCC scheduled for locoregional treatment were enrolled between April 2021 and March 2023. Patients were randomly divided into 3D-CEUS/MRI–CEUS fusion imaging group (3D/fusion group) or 2D-CEUS group (2D group). CEUS was performed 1 week before and 4–6 weeks after locoregional treatment. Contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) 4–6 weeks after treatment was set as the reference standard. CEUS images were evaluated for the presence or absence of viable tumors. Diagnostic performance criteria, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC), were determined for each modality. A total of 140 patients were included, 70 patients in the 2D group (mean age, 60.2 ± 10.4 years) and 70 patients in the 3D/fusion group (mean age, 59.8 ± 10.6 years). The sensitivity of the 3D/fusion group was 100.0
More
Translated text
Key words
Ultrasonography,Imaging (three-dimensional),Carcinoma (hepatocellular),Treatment outcome
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined