Clinical characteristics and outcome of double-seropositive patients with anti-glomerular basement membrane antibodies and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies

Objective To explore the clinical characteristics of double-seropositive patients (DPPs) with anti-glomerular basement membrane (Anti-GBM) antibodies and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA). Methods We collected patients with both ANCA and anti-GBM positive glomerulonephritis who were hospitalized in the Department of Nephrology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2010 to August 2022. Retrospective analysis of the baseline clinical characteristics of patients and follow-up to explore relevant factors affecting renal and patient survival. Results A total of 386 patients, including 69 ANCA negative anti-GBM glomerulonephritis patients, 296 anti-GBM negative ANCA associated vasculitis (AAV) patients, and 21 DPPs were enrolled in this study. Among the 21 DPPs aged 68.0 years (59.5, 74.0), there were 11 males and 10 females. The median serum creatinine at diagnosis was 629.0 (343.85, 788.75) μmol/L, and the median eGFR (CKD-EPI) was 7.58 (4.74, 13.77) mL/min. Fifteen cases (71.4 %) underwent initial RRT. After a follow-up of 40.0 (11.0, 73.0) months, 13 out of 21 DPPs (61.9 %) received maintenance RRT, while 49 out of 69 (71.0 %) ANCA negative anti-GBM-GN patients and 124 out of 296 (41.9 %) anti-GBM negative AAV patients received maintenance RRT (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that DPPs and ANCA negative anti-GBM-GN patients were more likely to progress to ESRD than anti-GBM negative AAV patients (P = 0.001). Among the 21 patients with DPPs, renal survival was significantly better in patients with better initial renal function, including those who did not receive initial RRT (P = 0.003), with lower serum creatinine levels (Cr < 629.0 μmol/L, P = 0.004) and higher eGFR levels (eGFR ≥ 7.60 ml/min, P = 0.005) than those with poor initial renal function. At the end of follow-up, 14 out of 21 DPPs (66.7 %) survived. Survival analysis showed no significant difference among patients in DPPs group, ANCA negative anti-GBM-GN group, and anti-GBM negative AAV group. Conclusions DPPs and ANCA negative anti-GBM-GN patients were more likely to progress to ESRD than anti-GBM negative AAV patients. In DPPs, the poor renal function at diagnosis might be a risk factor associated with poor renal survival.