Tisotumab Vedotin as Second- or Third-Line Therapy for Recurrent Cervical Cancer.

Ignace Vergote, Antonio González-Martín,Keiichi Fujiwara, Elsa Kalbacher, Andrea Bagaméri,Sharad Ghamande,Jung-Yun Lee, Susana Banerjee, Fernando Cotait Maluf, Domenica Lorusso, Kan Yonemori,Els Van Nieuwenhuysen, Luis Manso, Linn Woelber,Anneke Westermann,Allan Covens,Kosei Hasegawa,Byoung-Gie Kim, Miriam Raimondo,Maria Bjurberg, Felipe Melo Cruz,Antoine Angelergues,David Cibula, Lisa Barraclough, Ana Oaknin,Christine Gennigens, Leo Nicacio, Melinda Siew Leng Teng, Elizabeth Whalley,Ibrahima Soumaoro, Brian M Slomovitz, innovaTV /ENGOT-cx/GOG- Collaborators

The New England journal of medicine(2024)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
BACKGROUND:Recurrent cervical cancer is a life-threatening disease, with limited treatment options available when disease progression occurs after first-line combination therapy. METHODS:We conducted a phase 3, multinational, open-label trial of tisotumab vedotin as second- or third-line therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive tisotumab vedotin monotherapy (2.0 mg per kilogram of body weight every 3 weeks) or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (topotecan, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, irinotecan, or pemetrexed). The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS:A total of 502 patients underwent randomization (253 were assigned to the tisotumab vedotin group and 249 to the chemotherapy group); the groups were similar with respect to demographic and disease characteristics. The median overall survival was significantly longer in the tisotumab vedotin group than in the chemotherapy group (11.5 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 9.8 to 14.9] vs. 9.5 months [95% CI, 7.9 to 10.7]), results that represented a 30% lower risk of death with tisotumab vedotin than with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.89; two-sided P = 0.004). The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 4.4) with tisotumab vedotin and 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 3.1) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.82; two-sided P<0.001). The confirmed objective response rate was 17.8% in the tisotumab vedotin group and 5.2% in the chemotherapy group (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.1 to 7.6; two-sided P<0.001). A total of 98.4% of patients in the tisotumab vedotin group and 99.2% in the chemotherapy group had at least one adverse event that occurred during the treatment period (defined as the period from day 1 of dose 1 until 30 days after the last dose); grade 3 or greater events occurred in 52.0% and 62.3%, respectively. A total of 14.8% of patients stopped tisotumab vedotin treatment because of toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with recurrent cervical cancer, second- or third-line treatment with tisotumab vedotin resulted in significantly greater efficacy than chemotherapy. (Funded by Genmab and Seagen [acquired by Pfizer]; innovaTV 301 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04697628.).
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要