Rejuvenating silicon probes for acute neurophysiology.

Journal of neurophysiology(2024)

Cited 0|Views4
No score
Abstract
Neurophysiological recording with a new probe often yields better signal quality than with a used probe. Why does the signal quality degrade after only a few experiments? Here, we considered silicon probes in which the contacts are densely packed, and each contact is coated with a conductive polymer that increases its surface area. We tested 12 Cambridge Neurotech silicon probes during 61 recording sessions from the brain of three marmosets. Out of the box, each probe arrived with an electrodeposited polymer coating on 64 gold contacts and an impedance of around 50 kΩ. With repeated use, the impedance increased and there was a corresponding decrease in the number of well-isolated neurons. Imaging of the probes suggested that the reduction in signal quality was due to a gradual loss of the polymer coating. To rejuvenate the probes, we first stripped the contacts, completely removing their polymer coating, and then recoated them in a solution of 10 mM 3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) monomer with 11 mM Poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS) using a current density of about 3 mA/cm2 for 30 s. This recoating process not only returned probe impedance to around 50 kΩ but also yielded significantly improved signal quality during neurophysiological recordings. Thus, insertion into the brain promoted the loss of the polymer that coated the contacts of the silicon probes. This led to degradation of signal quality, but recoating rejuvenated the probes.NEW & NOTEWORTHY With repeated use, a silicon probe's ability to isolate neurons degrades. As a result, the probe is often discarded after only a handful of uses. Here, we demonstrate a major source of this problem and then produce a solution to rejuvenate the probes.
More
Translated text
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined