Effectiveness of a specific trauma training on war-related truncal injury management: a pre-post study.

Background Non-Compressible Torso Hemorrhage (NCTH) is the leading cause of preventable death in combat casualty care. To enhance the French military surgeons' preparedness, the French Military Health Service designed the Advanced Course for Deployment Surgery (ACDS) in 2008. This study evaluates behavioral changes in war surgery practice since its implementation.Methods Data were extracted from the OPEX® registry, which recorded all surgical activity during deployment from 2003 to 2021. All patients treated in French Role 2 or 3 Medical Treatment Facilities (MTFs) deployed in Afghanistan, Mali, or Chad requiring emergency surgery for NCTH were included. The mechanism of injury, severity, and surgical procedures were noted. Surgical care produced before (Control group) and after the implementation of the ACDS course (ACDS group) were compared.Results We included 189 trauma patients; 99 in the ACDS group and 90 in the Control group. Most injuries were combat-related (88% of the ACDS and 82% of the Control group). The ACDS group had more polytrauma (42% vs. 27%; p = 0.034) and more e-FAST detailed patients (35% vs. 21%; p = 0.044). Basics in surgical trauma care were similar between both groups, with a tendency in the ACDS group toward less digestive diversion (n = 6 [6%] vs. n = 12 [13%]; p = 0.128), more temporary closure with abdominal packing (n = 17 [17%] vs. n = 10 [11%]; p = 0.327), and less re-operation for bleeding (n = 0 [0%] vs. n = 5 [6%]; p = 0.046).Conclusion The French model of war trauma course succeeded in keeping specialized surgeons aware of the basics of damage control surgery. The main improvements were better use of preoperative imaging and better management of seriously injured patients.