Xpert-Ultra Assay in Stool and Urine Samples to Improve Tuberculosis Diagnosis in Children: The Médecins Sans Frontières Experience in Guinea-Bissau and South Sudan.

Laura Moretó-Planas, Raman Mahajan, Lazro Fidelle Nyikayo, Yoanis Bedpinj Peter Ajack, Buai Tut Chol, Eltigani Osman, Mitchell Sangma, Apal Tobi, Jonathan Gallo, Evelize Biague, Ramiro Gonçalves,Mercè Rocaspana, Cándida Medina, Miguel Camará,Laurence Flevaud, Lisa C Ruby,Sabine Bélard,María José Sagrado, Israel Molina,Augusto E Llosa

Open forum infectious diseases(2024)

Cited 0|Views4
No score
Abstract
Background:More than half of childhood tuberculosis cases remain undiagnosed yearly. The World Health Organization recommends the Xpert-Ultra assay as a first pediatric diagnosis test, but microbiological confirmation remains low. We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of Xpert-Ultra with stool and urine samples in presumptive pediatric tuberculosis cases in 2 high-tuberculosis-burden settings. Methods:This Médecins Sans Frontières cross-sectional multicentric study took place at Simão Mendes Hospital, Guinea-Bissau (July 2019 to April 2020) and in Malakal Hospital, South Sudan (April 2021 to June 2023). Children aged 6 months to 15 years with presumptive tuberculosis underwent clinical and laboratory assessment, with 1 respiratory and/or extrapulmonary sample (reference standard [RS]), 1 stool, and 1 urine specimen analyzed with Xpert-Ultra. Results:A total of 563 children were enrolled in the study, 133 from Bissau and 400 from Malakal; 30 were excluded. Confirmation of tuberculosis was achieved in 75 (14.1%), while 248 (46.5%) had unconfirmed tuberculosis. Of 553 with an RS specimen, the overall diagnostic yield was 12.4% (66 of 533). A total of 493 stool and 524 urine samples were used to evaluate the performance of Xpert-Ultra with these samples. Compared with the RS, the sensitivity and specificity of Xpert-Ultra were 62.5% (95% confidence interval, 49.4%-74%) and 98.3% (96.7%-99.2%), respectively, with stool samples, and 13.9% (7.5%-24.3%) and 99.4% (98.1%-99.8%) with urine samples. Nine patients were positive with stool and/or urine samples but negative with the RS. Conclusions:Xpert-Ultra in stool samples showed moderate to high sensitivity and high specificity compared with the RS and an added diagnostic yield when RS results were negative. Xpert-Ultra in stool samples was useful in extrapulmonary cases. Xpert-Ultra in urine samples showed low test performance. Clinical Trials Registration:NCT06239337.
More
Translated text
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined