Cytoprotective 3K3A-activated protein C and plasma: A comparison of therapeutics for the endotheliopathy of trauma.

BACKGROUND:Both healthy plasma and cytoprotective aPC (3K3A-aPC) have been shown to mitigate the endotheliopathy of trauma (EoT), but optimal therapeutics remain unknown. Our aim was therefore to determine optimal therapies to mitigate EoT by investigating the effectiveness of 3K3A-aPC with and without plasma-based resuscitation strategies. METHODS:Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) was used to measure real-time permeability changes in endothelial cells. Cells were treated with a 2 μg/mL solution of aPC 30 minutes prior to stimulation with plasma taken from severely injured trauma patients (ISS > 15 and BD < -6) (TP). Healthy plasma, or plasma frozen within 24 hours (FP24), was added concomitantly with TP. Cells treated with thrombin and untreated cells were included in this study as control groups. RESULTS:A dose-dependent difference was found between the 5% and 10% plasma-treated groups when HUVECs were simultaneously stimulated with TP (μd 7.346 95%CI 4.574 to 10.12). There was no difference when compared to TP alone in the 5% (μd 5.713 95%CI -1.751 to 13.18) or 10% group (μd -1.633 95%CI -9.097 to 5.832). When 3K3A-aPC was added to plasma and TP, the 5% group showed improvement in permeability compared to TP alone (μd 10.11 95%CI 2.642 to 17.57), but there was no difference in the 10% group (μd -1.394 95%CI -8.859 to 6.070). The combination of 3K3A-aPC, plasma, and TP at both the 5% plasma (μd -28.52 95%CI-34.72 to -22.32) and 10% plasma concentrations (μd -40.02 95%CI -46.22 to -33.82) had higher inter-cellular permeability than the 3K3A-aPC pre-incubation group. CONCLUSION:Our data shows that FP24, in a post-trauma environment, pre-treatment with 3K3A-aPC can potentially mitigate the EoT to a greater degree than FP24 with or without 3K3A-aPC. Although further exploration is needed, this represents a potentially ideal and perhaps superior therapeutic treatment for the dysregulated thromboinflammation of injured patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Prognostic/Epidemiological, Therapeutic/Care Management, Level III.