Executive Summary of the American Radium Society® (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Non-Operative Management (NOM) for Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines

Purpose For rectal cancer patients, the standard approach of chemotherapy, radiation therapy (RT), and surgery (Trimodality Therapy, TMT) is associated with significant long-term toxicity and/or colostomy for most patients. Patient options focused on quality-of-life (QOL) have dramatically improved, but there remains limited guidance regarding comparative effectiveness. This systematic review and associated guidelines evaluate how various treatment strategies compare to each other in terms of oncologic outcomes and QOL. Materials and Methods Cochrane and PRISMA methodology were used to search for prospective and retrospective trials and meta-analyses of adequate quality within the Ovid Medline database between 1/1/2012–6/15/2023. These studies informed the expert panel, which rated the appropriateness of various treatments in 6 clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). Results The search process yielded 197 articles that advised voting. Increasing data show non-operative management (NOM) and primary surgery result in QOL benefits noted over TMT without detriment to oncologic outcomes. For rectal cancer patients for whom TME would result in permanent colostomy or inadequate bowel continence, NOM was strongly recommended as usually appropriate. Restaging with tumor response assessment 8–12 weeks following completion of RT/CRT was deemed a necessary component of NOM. The panel recommended active surveillance in the setting of a near complete or complete response. In the setting of NOM, 54-56 Gy in 27-33 fractions concurrent with chemotherapy and followed by consolidation chemotherapy was recommended. The panel strongly recommends primary surgery as usually appropriate for a T3N0 high rectal tumor for whom LAR and adequate bowel function is possible, with adjuvant chemotherapy considered if N+. Conclusions Recent data supports NOM and primary surgery as important options that should be offered to eligible patients. Considering the complexity of multi-disciplinary management, patients should be discussed in a multi-disciplinary setting and therapy should be tailored to individual patient goals/values.