An anatomo-functional study of the interactivity between the paracentral lobule and the primary motor cortex.

OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to understand the anatomical and functional connections between the paracentral lobule (PCL) and the primary motor cortex (M1) of the human brain. METHODS:This retrospective study included 16 patients who underwent resection of lesions located near M1. Nine patients had lesions in the dominant hemisphere. Tractography was performed to visualize the connectivity between two regions of interest (ROIs)-the convexity and the interhemispheric fissure-that were shown by functional MRI to be activated during a finger tapping task. The number, mean length, and fractional anisotropy (FA) of the fibers between the ROIs were estimated. During surgery, subdural electrodes were placed on the brain surface, including the ROIs, using a navigation system. Cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) were evoked by applying electrical stimuli to the hand region of M1 using electrodes placed on the convexity and were measured with electrodes placed on the interhemispheric fissure. To verify CCEP bidirectionality, electrical stimuli were applied to electrodes on the interhemispheric fissure that showed CCEP responses. Correlations of CCEP amplitudes and latencies with the number, mean length, and mean FA value obtained from tractography were determined. The correlations between these parameters and perioperative motor functions were also analyzed. RESULTS:Fibers of 14 patients were visualized by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Unidirectional CCEPs between the PCL and M1 were measurable in all 16 patients, and bidirectional CCEPs between them were measurable in 14 patients. There was no significant difference between the two directions in the maximum CCEP amplitude or latency (amplitude, p = 0.391; latency, p = 0.583). Neither the amplitude nor latency showed any apparent correlation with the number, mean length, or mean FA value of the fibers obtained from tractography. Pre- and postoperative motor function of the hands was not significantly correlated with CCEP amplitude or latency. The number and mean FA value of fibers obtained by DTI, as well as the maximum CCEP amplitude, varied between patients. CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrated an anatomical connection and a bidirectional functional connection between the PCL, including the supplementary motor area, and M1 of the human brain. The observed variability between patients suggests possible motor function plasticity. These findings may serve as a foundation for further studies.