Focal pulsed field ablation for organised atrial tachyarrhythmias: one to rule them all

Abstract Background Focal pulsed field ablation (fPFA) has emerged as a versatile and innovative strategy for ablating atrial tachyarrhythmias (1). The primary objective of this study is to present the short-term safety characteristics, feasibility and procedural outcomes of fPFA in the management of organised atrial tachyarrhythmias. This report focuses on the commercial use of an innovative pulsed field ablation (PFA) generator, utilized in conjunction with commercially available focal, solid-tip ablation catheters, and complemented by 3D electro-anatomical mapping (3D-EAM). Methods Patients with organised atrial tachycardia treated using fPFA between August 2022 and September 2023 at our center were included in this retrospective analysis. Tachycardia mechanisms were identified with high-definition, multi-electrode mapping catheter paired with 3D-EAM system. Ablation lines, when targeting macro-reentrant arrhythmias were strategicaly positioned to adress critical isthmi when recognised or they were empirically placed between the anatomical obstacles ( including LA roof, anterior, mitral isthmus, upper septal and cavotricuspid line as deemed appropriate). Positioning of the fPFA catheter was guided by 3D-EAM, intracardiac ultrasound, and fluoroscopy (Figure 1). Bidirectional block verification was performed using standard criteria to assess acute procedural success. Glyceryl trinitrate boluses were administered prior to ablation in proximity to coronary arteries. Results In a cohort of 36 patients (median age 62 years; 12 females), we effectively mapped and treated a total of 51 distinct organised atrial tachyarrhythmias. These included 18 typical flutters, 3 roof-dependent macro-reentries, 4 posterior-wall micro-reentries, 15 peri-mitral macro-reentries, 8 anterior-wall micro-reentries and 3 biatrial macro-reentries via Bachman bundle. Our ablation strategy involved creating 21 cavotricuspid isthmus lines, 3 roof lines, 18 posterior wall lines, 11 anterior lines, 8 septal lines, and 15 mitral isthmus lines (Figure 2). Impressively, first-pass acute isolation with bidirectional block was achieved in 93% (54 of 58) of isthmus ablations and 94% (17 of 18) of left posterior wall lines. No ST segment alterations or other complications were observed during the periprocedural period. Conclusion In our cohort fPFA proved as a feasible, effective, and safe approach for treating organised atrial tacharrhythmias. The primary reason for designating this setup as our preferred choice for redo procedures lies in its versatility in addressing a wide range of arrhythmias. As ultra-fast pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures become more prevalent with the expansion of PFA, the demand for an ideal setup capable of effectively targeting various substrates will become even more pronounced (2). Notably, our findings suggest superior suitability and efficacy when compared to bulkier, single-shot design PFA devices (3).Figure 1Figure 2