Sunscreens Part 2: Regulation and Safety

Sara Abdel Azim, Liat Bainvoll,Natalia Vecerek,Vincent A. DeLeo,Brandon L. Adler

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology(2024)

引用 0|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
The second part of this CME article discusses sunscreen regulation and safety considerations for humans and the environment. First, we provide an overview of the history of the United States Food and Drug Administration’s regulation of sunscreen. Recent Food and Drug Administration studies clearly demonstrate that organic ultraviolet filters are systemically absorbed during routine sunscreen use, but to date there is no evidence of associated negative health effects. We also review the current evidence of sunscreen’s association with vitamin D levels and frontal fibrosing alopecia, and recent concerns regarding benzene contamination. Finally, we review the possible environmental effects of ultraviolet filters, particularly coral bleaching. While climate change has been shown to be the primary driver of coral bleaching, laboratory-based studies suggest that organic ultraviolet filters represent an additional contributing factor, which led several localities to ban certain organic filters.
更多
查看译文
关键词
sunscreen,OTC drugs,sunscreen monograph,SPF,chemical filters,physical filters,organic filters,inorganic filters,UVA,UVB,proposed rule,GRASE,Maximal Usage Trial,PABA,trolamine salicylate,zinc oxide,titanium dioxide,deemed final order,CARES Act,contact dermatitis,contact allergy,oxybenzone,avobenzone,benzophenones,reproductive toxicity,systemic absorption,nanoparticle,vitamin D,hypovitaminosis D,frontal fibrosing alopecia,benzene,wastewater treatment plants,coral reefs,coral bleaching,climate change,global warming,Hawaii,reef safe sunscreen
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要