Protocolized reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in septic shock patients (REDUSE): a randomized multicentre feasibility trial

Anja Lindén, M. Spångfors, M. H. Olsen, J. Fisher, G. Lilja, F. Sjövall, M. Jungner, M. Lengquist, T. Kander, L. Samuelsson, J. Johansson, E. Palmnäs, J. Undén, J. Oras, M. Cronhjort, M. Chew, A. Linder, M. Lipcsey, N. Nielsen, J. C. Jakobsen, P. Bentzer

Critical Care(2024)

Cited 0|Views0
No score
Abstract
Non-resuscitation fluids constitute the majority of fluid administered for septic shock patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This multicentre, randomized, feasibility trial was conducted to test the hypothesis that a restrictive protocol targeting non-resuscitation fluids reduces the overall volume administered compared with usual care. Adults with septic shock in six Swedish ICUs were randomized within 12 h of ICU admission to receive either protocolized reduction of non-resuscitation fluids or usual care. The primary outcome was the total volume of fluid administered within three days of inclusion. Median (IQR) total volume of fluid in the first three days, was 6008 ml (interquartile range [IQR] 3960–8123) in the restrictive fluid group (n = 44), and 9765 ml (IQR 6804–12,401) in the control group (n = 48); corresponding to a Hodges–Lehmann median difference of 3560 ml [95 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05249088
More
Translated text
Key words
Septic shock,Fluid therapy,Non-resuscitation fluids,Randomized controlled trial,Feasibility
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined