Transgender Women Exhibit a Distinct Stress Echocardiography Profile Compared With Age-Matched Cisgender Counterparts: The Mayo Clinic Women's Heart Clinic Experience.

BACKGROUND:Stress echocardiographic (SE) testing is an important modality in cardiovascular risk stratification and obstructive coronary artery disease assessment. Binary sex-based parameters are classically used for the interpretation of these studies, even among transgender women (TGW). Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. Yet, it remains unclear whether TGW exhibit a distinct stress testing profile from their cisgender counterparts. METHODS:Using a matched case-control study design, the authors compared the echocardiographic stress testing profiles of TGW (n = 43) with those of matched cisgender men (CGM; n = 84) and cisgender women (CGW; n = 86) at a single center. Relevant data, including demographics, comorbidities, and cardiac testing data, were manually extracted from the patients' charts. RESULTS:The prevalence of hypertension and dyslipidemia was similar between TGW and CGW and lower than that of CGM (P = .003 and P = .009, respectively). The majority of comorbidities and laboratory values were similar. On average, TGW had higher heart rates than CGM (P = .002) and had lower blood pressures than CGM and CGW (P < .05). TGW's double product and metabolic equivalents were similar to those among CGW and lower than those of CGM (P = .016 and P = .018, respectively). On echocardiography, left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters among TGW were similar to those of CGW but lower than those of CGM (P = .023 and P = .018, respectively). Measures of systolic and diastolic function, except for exercise mitral valve E/e' ratio, which was lower in TGW than CGW (P = .029), were largely similar among the three groups. There was no difference in the wall motion score index, and therefore, no difference in the percentage of positive SE test results. CONCLUSIONS:This study shows, for the first time, that TGW have a SE profile that is distinct from that of their cisgender counterparts. Larger, multicenter, prospective studies are warranted to further characterize the SE profile of TGW.