Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Genital malformations in children with VACTERL – has time come to include “G” in the acronym?

Journal of Pediatric Surgery(2024)

Cited 0|Views16
No score
Abstract
Background Genital malformations are frequently diagnosed in patients with VACTERL, but are currently not included in the acronym. This study aimed to analyze the frequency of genital anomalies in patients with esophageal atresia (EA) and/or anorectal malformation (ARM), with a subgroup analysis of children fulfilling the VACTERL criteria. Method This was a cross-sectional retrospective analysis of two prospectively collected registries of patients operated on for ARM and EA between 2012 and 2022 at a specialized national center. Children were screened routinely for malformations according to the VACTERL acronym. Results A total of 174 children were included in the study. VACTERL was diagnosed in 60 children (34%), while 114 children (66%) were defined as non-VACTERL. Genital malformations were diagnosed in 38% (23/60) of the children with VACTERL, and in 11% (13/114) of the children without VACTERL (p<0.001). The presence of genital malformations correlated linearly with the number of diagnosed component features (CFs). In boys with VACTERL, the most common genital malformation was undescended testes present in 10/27 (21%) compared to 1/71 (1%) in non-VACTERL boys (p<0.001). Müllerian duct anomalies were found in 26% of girls with VACTERL vs. 7% in non-VACTERL girls (p<0.05). Conclusion There was a higher frequency of genital malformations in patients with VACTERL emphasizing the importance of genital assessment for these patients. We propose VACTERL-G as an extension of the current acronym aiming to reduce the risk of long-term morbidity due to delayed diagnosis of reproductive anomalies. Level of Evidence 4
More
Translated text
Key words
ARM,EA,VASTERL,VACTERL-G,Malformation,Genital
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined