Revisiting general dark matter-bound-electron interactions
arxiv(2024)
摘要
In this letter we revisit general dark matter (DM)-bound-electron
interactions studied previously in the influential work of [Catena et al.,
Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033195 (2020)]. We derive the DM-electron response functions
and find a crucial minus sign was missed for the second atomic response
function W_2 defined in that work. The minus sign has significant
phenomenological consequences when explaining experimental bounds on specific
DM scenarios. Furthermore, for the most general DM-electron nonrelativistic or
relativistic interactions for DM with spin up to one, we find there are three
DM response functions (a_0,1,2) whose corresponding atomic response
functions (W_0,1,2) are linear combinations of the four response
functions (W_1,2,3,4) given in that work,
W_0 = W_1, W_2 = |𝐯_0^⊥|^2 W_1+ W_3 - 2 m_e 𝐪·𝐯_0^⊥𝐪^2 W_2, W_3 =
(𝐪·𝐯_0^⊥)^2 𝐪^2 W_1 + m_e^2 𝐪^2W_4 - 2 m_e 𝐪·𝐯_0^⊥𝐪^2 W_2.
Due to the minus sign correction for W_2, there can be
significant cancellations between the W_2 and W_3,4 terms, so that
W_2,3 are dominated by the usual response function W_1 in some
cases. Ignoring the sign could thus result in misinterpretation of the
experimental data in some DM scenarios. As an example, we show that the recent
XENON1T constraint on the fermionic DM anapole moment is weakened by a factor
of 2 or so. Many DM scenarios involving DM or electron axial-vector current can
yield W_2 and thus are potentially affected by the sign.
更多查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
![](https://originalfileserver.aminer.cn/sys/aminer/pubs/mrt_preview.jpeg)
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要