Relative Performance of Volume of Distribution Prediction Methods for Lipophilic Drugs with Uncertainty in LogP Value

The goal was to assess, for lipophilic drugs, the impact of logP on human volume of distribution at steady-state (VDss) predictions, including intermediate fut and Kp values, from six methods: Oie-Tozer, Rodgers-Rowland (tissue-specific Kp and only muscle Kp), GastroPlus, Korzekwa-Nagar, and TCM-New. A sensitivity analysis with focus on logP was conducted by keeping pKa and fup constant for each of four drugs, while varying logP. VDss was also calculated for the specific literature logP values. Error prediction analysis was conducted by analyzing prediction errors by source of logP values, drug, and overall values. The Rodgers-Rowland methods were highly sensitive to logP values, followed by GastroPlus and Korzekwa-Nagar. The Oie-Tozer and TCM-New methods were only modestly sensitive to logP. Hence, the relative performance of these methods depended upon the source of logP value. As logP values increased, TCM-New and Oie-Tozer were the most accurate methods. TCM-New was the only method that was accurate regardless of logP value source. Oie-Tozer provided accurate predictions for griseofulvin, posaconazole, and isavuconazole; GastroPlus for itraconazole and isavuconazole; Korzekwa-Nagar for posaconazole; and TCM-New for griseofulvin, posaconazole, and isavuconazole. Both Rodgers-Rowland methods provided inaccurate predictions due to the overprediction of VDss. TCM-New was the most accurate prediction of human VDss across four drugs and three logP sources, followed by Oie-Tozer. TCM-New showed to be the best method for VDss prediction of highly lipophilic drugs, suggesting BPR as a favorable surrogate for drug partitioning in the tissues, and which avoids the use of fup.