Sex and gender-based analysis and diversity metric reporting in acute care trials published in high-impact journals: a systematic review.

David Granton,Myanca Rodrigues,Valeria Raparelli, Kimia Honarmand, Arnav Agarwal, Jan O Friedrich,Benedetta Perna, Riccardo Spaggiari,Valeria Fortunato, Gianluca Risdonne,Michelle Kho,Sandra VanderKaay,Dipayan Chaudhuri,Carolina Gomez-Builes, Frédérick D'Aragon, Daniel Wiseman,Vincent Issac Lau, Celina Lin,Julie Reid,Vatsal Trivedi,Varuna Prakash,Emilie Belley-Cote, Maha Al Mandhari,Lehana Thabane, Louise Pilote,Karen E A Burns

BMJ open(2024)

引用 0|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
OBJECTIVE:To characterise sex and gender-based analysis (SGBA) and diversity metric reporting, representation of female/women participants in acute care trials and temporal changes in reporting before and after publication of the 2016 Sex and Gender Equity in Research guideline. DESIGN:Systematic review. DATA SOURCES:We searched MEDLINE for trials published in five leading medical journals in 2014, 2018 and 2020. STUDY SELECTION:Trials that enrolled acutely ill adults, compared two or more interventions and reported at least one clinical outcome. DATA ABSTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS:4 reviewers screened citations and 22 reviewers abstracted data, in duplicate. We compared reporting differences between intensive care unit (ICU) and cardiology trials. RESULTS:We included 88 trials (75 (85.2%) ICU and 13 (14.8%) cardiology) (n=111 428; 38 140 (34.2%) females/women). Of 23 (26.1%) trials that reported an SGBA, most used a forest plot (22 (95.7%)), were prespecified (21 (91.3%)) and reported a sex-by-intervention interaction with a significance test (19 (82.6%)). Discordant sex and gender terminology were found between headings and subheadings within baseline characteristics tables (17/32 (53.1%)) and between baseline characteristics tables and SGBA (4/23 (17.4%)). Only 25 acute care trials (28.4%) reported race or ethnicity. Participants were predominantly white (78.8%) and male/men (65.8%). No trial reported gendered-social factors. SGBA reporting and female/women representation did not improve temporally. Compared with ICU trials, cardiology trials reported significantly more SGBA (15/75 (20%) vs 8/13 (61.5%) p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS:Acute care trials in leading medical journals infrequently included SGBA, female/women and non-white trial participants, reported race or ethnicity and never reported gender-related factors. Substantial opportunity exists to improve SGBA and diversity metric reporting and recruitment of female/women participants in acute care trials. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER:CRD42022282565.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要