Acute effect of ultramarathon on systolic and diastolic cardiac function: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Ultramarathon running poses physiological challenges, impacting cardiac function. This systematic review and meta-analysis explore the acute effects of single-stage ultramarathon running on cardiac function. Methods Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations were followed. Searches covered Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Central Cochrane, and Scopus. Random effects meta-analyses assessed left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) variables, expressed as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Among 6972 studies, 17 were included. Post-ultramarathon reductions were found in LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (−1.24; 95% CI = −1.77, −0.71 mm), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) (−9.92; 95% CI = −15.25, −4.60 ml), LV stroke volume (LVSV) (−8.96 ml, 95% CI -13.20, −4.72 ml), LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (−3.71; 95% CI = −5.21, −2.22%), LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) (−1.48; 95% CI = −2.21, −0.76%), E/A (−0.30; 95% CI = −0.38, −0.22 cm/s), .E' (−1.35 cm/s, 95% CI -1.91, −0.79 cm/s), RV fractional area change (RVFAC) (−3.34, 95% CI = −5.84, −0.84%), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (−0.12, 95% CI = −0.22, −0.02 cm), RV global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) (−1.73, 95% CI = −2.87, −0.59%), with increases in RV end-diastolic area (RVEDA) (1.89, 95% CI = 0.63, 3.14 cm2), RV Peak A' (1.32 cm/s, 95% CI 0.20, 2.44), and heart rate (18.24, 95% CI = 15.16, 21.32). No significant differences were observed in LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), RV end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD), RV Peak E', and RV Peak S′. Conclusions Evidence suggests immediate impairment of systolic and diastolic cardiac function post-ultramarathon running.