Survey of pharmaceutical industry's best practices around in vitro transporter assessment and Implications for Drug Development: Considerations from the IQ Transporter Working Group.

Helen E Rollison,Pallabi Mitra, Hugues Chanteux, Zhizhou Fang,Xiaomin Liang, Seong Hee Park, Chester Costales,Imad Hanna, Nilay Thakkar, James M Vergis, Daniel A J Bow, Kathleen M Hillgren, Jochen Brumm,Xiaoyan Chu, Cornelis E C A Hop,Yurong Lai, Cindy Yanfei Li, Kelly M Mahar,Laurent Salphati, Rucha Sane,Hong Shen,Kunal Taskar,Mitchell E Taub, Kimio Tohyama, Christine Xu,Katherine S Fenner

Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals(2024)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
The IQ Transporter Working Group had a rare opportunity to analyse a cross-pharma collation of in vitro data and assay methods for the evaluation of drug transporter substrate and inhibitor potential. Experiments were generally performed in accordance with regulatory guidelines. Discrepancies, such as not considering the impact of pre-incubation for inhibition and free or measured in vitro drug concentrations, may be due to the retrospective nature of the dataset and analysis. Lipophilicity was a frequent indicator of cross-transport inhibition (P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B and OCT1) with high molecular weight ({greater than or equal to}500 Da) also common for OATP1B and BCRP inhibitors. A high level of overlap in in vitro inhibition across transporters was identified for BCRP, OATP1B1 and MATE1 suggesting that prediction of DDIs for these transporters will be common. In contrast inhibition of OAT1 did not coincide with inhibition of any other transporter. Neutrals, bases, and compounds with intermediate-high lipophilicity tended to be P-gp and/or BCRP substrates whilst compounds with MW <500 Da tended to be OAT3 substrates. Interestingly the majority of in vitro inhibitors were not reported to be followed up with a clinical study by the submitting company, whilst those compounds identified as substrates generally were. Approaches to metabolite testing were generally found to be similar to parent testing with metabolites generally being equally or less potent than parent compounds. However, examples where metabolites inhibited transporters in vitro were identified supporting the regulatory requirement for in vitro testing of metabolites to enable integrated clinical DDI risk assessment. Significance Statement A diverse dataset showed transporter inhibition often correlated with lipophilicity and molecular weight (>500 Da). Overlapping transporter inhibition was identified, particularly that inhibition of BCRP, OATP1B1 and MATE1 was frequent if the compound inhibited other transporters. In contrast inhibition of OAT1 did not correlate with the other drug transporters tested.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要