Abstract PO5-06-09: Metastatic triple negative breast cancer has distinct tumor immune landscape

Abstract Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is considered the most immunogenic breast cancer subtype due to higher levels of tumor infiltrating immune cells (TILS), elevated tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 expression, providing a rationale for immunotherapy. Here we aimed to investigate the differences in the immune microenvironment of primary vs. metastatic sites in TNBC vs. non-TNBC and their impact on survival. Methods: Comprehensive immune profiling, including PD-L1 IHC and the expression of 395 immune genes, was performed on 147 real-world FFPE breast cancer samples (32 primary, 115 metastatic). 37 samples were, by definition, triple negative for ER, PR, and HER2 overexpression. PD-L1 (CPS positive ≥1% and CPS positive ≥10%) was determined using immunohistochemistry (22C3). mRNA expression signatures of tumor inflammation (TIGS, weak/moderate/strong) and cell proliferation (CP, poor/moderate/high) were determined by RNA-sequencing. Demographic and clinicopathologic variables were collected. Statistical comparisons of biomarkers between groups were calculated using the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test for continuous variables and the proportions test for categorical variables (p≤0.05 for significance). Survival differences were quantified by Cox proportional hazards analysis (p≤0.05 for significance). Results: Triple negative status was associated with current use of alcohol [p=0.03]. Black patients were also more likely to have TNBC, constituting 24% of TNBC patients while only making up 14% of the total cohort [p=0.04]. Conversely, white patients were less likely to have TNBC, constituting 73% of TNBC patients while making up 84% of the total cohort [p=0.04]. Comparing TNBC and non-TNBC cases, TNBC cases were observed to have significantly higher TIGS [p=0.014] and PD-L1 expression [p=4.4 × 10−7]. Additionally, TNBC cases trended towards exhibiting greater cell proliferation [p=0.069]. These differences were found to be driven primarily by metastatic tumors, among which TNBC tumors showed significantly higher TIGS [p=0.015], cell proliferation [p=0.021], and PD-L1 expression [p=2.9 × 10−7] than non-TNBC tumors, while none of these significant associations were observed among primary tumors. Triple negative status was significantly associated with PD-L1 expression (assessed by IHC), with a majority of PD-L1 positive cases determined to be triple negative [70% of CPS≥1% cases, p=5 × 10-5; 59% of CPS≥10% cases, p=6 × 10−4]. Several immune-related genes and immune checkpoint molecules were over-expressed in triple negative breast cancer, including CD8, GZMB, PRF1, CCL5, IFNG, TIGIT and CXCL10. A number of genes were also significantly overexpressed in metastatic tumors: KRT5 [p=0.02], TFRC [p=0.04], ABCF1 [p=0.04], FCRLA [p=0.05], LAMP3 [p=0.05], and underexpressed in metastatic tumors: ENTPD1 [p=0.05], IGSF6 [p=0.03], and ITGA1 [p=0.03]. Conclusions: Our comprehensive biomarker analyses showed that metastatic TNBC has a more inflamed tumor microenvironment and higher checkpoint target expression compared to non-TNBC. Further analysis of immune expression by site-specific metastases and correlation with immunotherapy outcomes is warranted to guide clinicians in selection of the ideal metastatic site to biopsy for therapeutic decision making. However, in a collective TNBC context, these data support the use of immunotherapy in metastatic TNBC. Citation Format: Robert Seager, Heidi Ko, Sarabjot Pabla, Maria-Fernanda Senosain, Erik Van Roey, Shuang Gao, Kyle Strickland, Rebecca Previs, Mary Nesline, Stephanie Hastings, Shengle Zhang, Jeffrey Conroy, Taylor Jensen, Marcia Eisenberg, Brian Caveney, Eric Severson, Shakti Ramkissoon, Shipra Gandhi. Metastatic triple negative breast cancer has distinct tumor immune landscape [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-06-09.