Primary fit tracheoesophageal puncture in primary versus salvage laryngectomy: Short-term and long-term complications and functional outcomes

Emese C. Kanyo,Shannon S. Wu, Chandana A. Reddy,Natalie L. Silver, Eric D. Lamarre,Brian B. Burkey, Brandon L. Prendes,Joseph Scharpf, Robert R. Lorenz, Joann Kmiecik,Jamie A. Ku

HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
BackgroundPrimary fit tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) is widely preferred for individuals who have not undergone prior radiation. However, there is no consensus on the relative utility of primary-fit TEP in the setting of salvage laryngectomy.MethodsA retrospective, single-center review was conducted of individuals undergoing laryngectomy with primary fit TEP between 2012 and 2018. Multivariable analysis was conducted to compare short-term and long-term complications, as well as speech and swallowing outcomes, of those who underwent primary versus salvage laryngectomy.ResultsIn this study, 134 patients underwent total laryngectomy with primary fit TEP. Aside from a higher rate of peristomal dehiscence (13.1% vs. 1.4%) found in the salvage group, there was no difference in incidence of all other complications, including pharyngocutaneous fistula formation. The groups had comparable speech and swallow outcomes.ConclusionPrimary fit TEP is a safe and effective surgical choice for individuals undergoing salvage laryngectomy who desire a voice prosthesis.
更多
查看译文
关键词
functional outcomes,laryngeal cancer,pharyngocutaneous fistula,salvage laryngectomy,tracheoesophageal puncture
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要