Conservative Versus Operative Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Older Individuals—an Analysis of Insurance Data.

BACKGROUND:Little is known about the frequency and results of conservative treatment of proximal humerus fractures in older individuals. METHODS:Billing data of the BARMER health insurance carrier for all patients of age 65 and above with proximal humerus fractures in the years 2005-2021 were retrospectively analyzed with multivariable Cox regression models, taking account of the patients' age, sex, and comorbidity profiles. The defined primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), major adverse events (MAE), thromboembolic events (TE), and complications of surgery or of trauma. Multivariable p values for the effect of treatment on all primary endpoints were jointly adjusted with the Bonferroni-Holm method. RESULTS:54% of 81 909 patients were treated conservatively. Conservative treatment was more common in those who received their diagnosis as outpatients (79.5%, vs. 37.2% for inpatients). Operative treatment was associated with significantly longer overall survival (long-term HR 0.89, 95% confidence interval [0,86; 0,91]) and fewer MAE (0.90; [0.88; 0.92]) and TE (0.89; [0.87; 0.92]), but more complications due to surgery or trauma (1.66; [1,.4; 1.78]; all p < 0.001). 3.1% of the patients who had been initially treated conservatively underwent surgery within 6 months of their diagnosis. Risk factors for the failure of conservative treatment included alcohol abuse, obesity, cancer, diabetes mellitus, Parkinson disease, and osteoporosis. CONCLUSION:The conservative treatment of proximal humerus fracture is associated with a lower overall rate of complications due to surgery or trauma, but also with more MAE and TE and higher overall mortality. These findings underline the need for individualized and risk-adjusted treatment recommendations.