Ongoing CPR with an onboard physician

Alfredo Echarri Sucunza,Patricia Fernández del Valle,Jose Antonio Iglesias Vázquez,Youcef Azeli, Jose María Navalpotro Pascual, Juan Valenciano Rodriguez, Cristian Fernández Barreras, Sonia Royo Embid, Carmen Gutiérrez-García, María Isabel Ceniceros Rozalén, Cesar Manuel Guerra García, Carmen del Pozo Pérez,María José Luque-Hernández,Silvia Sola Muñoz, Ana Belén Forner Canos, María Isabel Herrera Maíllo, Marcos Juanes García, Natividad Ramos García, Belén Muñoz Isabel, Junior Jose García Mendoza

Resuscitation Plus(2024)

引用 0|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction Recent data are not available on ongoing CPR for emergency services with an onboard physician. The aim of the present study was to identify factors associated with the decision to transport patients to hospital with ongoing CPR and examine their survival to hospital discharge with good neurological status. Methods An observational study based on a registry of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests attended to by emergency services with an onboard physician. All OHCA cases occurring between the 1st of January and the 31st of December 2022 were included. Patients receiving ongoing CPR during transport to the hospital were compared with patients pronounced dead at the scene following arrival of the care team. The dependent variable was ongoing CPR during transport to the hospital. The main characteristics and the neurological status of patients surviving to discharge were described. Results A total of 9321 cases were included, of which 350 (3.7%) were transported to hospital with ongoing CPR. Such patients were young (59.9 ± 20.1 years vs 64.6 ± 16.9 years; p < 0.001; 95%CI: 0.98 [0.98; 0.99]) with arrest taking place outside of the home (151 [44.5%] vs 4045 [68.01%]; p < 0.001; 95%CI: 0.41 [0.31; 0.54]) and being witnessed by EMS (126 [36.0%] vs 667 [11.0%]; p < 0.001; 95%CI: 4.31 [3.19; 5.80]), whilst initial rhythm differed from asystole (164 [47.6%] vs 4325 [73.0%]; p < 0.01; 95%CI: 0.44 [0.33; 0.60]) and a mechanical device was more often employed during resuscitation and transport to hospital (199 [56.9%] vs 2050 [33.8%]; p < 0.001; 95%CI: 2.75 [2.10; 3.59]). Seven patients (2%) were discharged alive from hospital, five with ad integrum neurological recovery (CPC1) and two with minimally impaired neurological function (CPC2). Conclusions The strategy of ongoing CPR is uncommon in EMS with an onboard physician. Despite their limited efficacy, the availability of mechanical chest compression devices, together with the possibility of specific hospital treatments, mainly ICP and ECMO, opens up the possibility of this approach with determined patients.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Out of hospital cardiac arrest,Survival,Ongoing CPR,Emergency medical services
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要