Pulsed-field vs. Cryoballoon vs. Radiofrequency ablation: outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Background Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has shown promising data in terms of safety and procedural efficiency for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), with similar long-term outcomes compared to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA) in patient with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) Objective To compare the procedural and long-term outcomes of patients with persistent AF undergoing PVI using PFA, CBA, or RFA. Methods Consecutive patients with persistent AF undergoing a first PVI with PFA, CBA, or RFA were included. Patients underwent 7d-Holter-ECG at 3, 6, and 12 months post-ablation. The primary outcome was recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia after a 90-day blanking period. Safety outcomes included the composite of in-hospital major adverse events. Results A total of 533 patients with persistent AF underwent PVI using PFA (n=214), CBA (n=190), or RFA (n=129). Procedures with PFA guided by fluoroscopy were shorter compared to CBA (median 60 min, IQR 53-80 vs. 84 min, IQR 68-101, p=<0.001), and procedures with PFA in combination with 3D-electroanatomical mapping were shorter compared to RFA (median 101 min, IQR 85-126 vs. 171 min, IQR 141-204, p<0.001). Acute safety events occurred in 2.3%, 2.6% and 0.8% in the PFA, CBA and RFA group (p=0.545). The 1-year confounder-adjusted estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias was 62.1% for CBA, 55.3% for PFA and 48.3% for RFA (CBA vs. PFA p=0.79, CBA vs. RFA p=0.009; PFA vs. RFA p=0.010). Conclusion In patients with persistent AF undergoing a first PVI, 1-year confounder-adjusted outcomes are better with PFA and CBA compared to RFA.