Center-level Outcomes Following Elective Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative Database

Journal of Vascular Surgery(2024)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
Background Hospital volume is associated with mortality after open aortic aneurysm repair. Fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (B-FEVAR) has been increasingly used for repair of complex thoracoabdominal and juxtarenal aneurysms but evidence of a center-volume relationship is limited. We aimed to measure the association of center volume with in-hospital mortality, post-operative outcomes and 1-year survival following B-FEVAR. Methods Patients undergoing elective endovascular thoracoabdominal and complex abdominal aneurysm repair with branch intervention (2014-2021) listed within the national Vascular Quality Initiative Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR)/complex EVAR database were analyzed. Centers were grouped into quartiles by mean annual procedure volume. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the effect of center volume on in-hospital mortality adjusting for baseline and procedural characteristics. Kaplan-Meier estimation, log rank test and mixed effects Cox regression were used to evaluate 1-year survival. Results A total of 4,302 adult elective F-BEVAR procedures were identified at a total of 163 centers. In-hospital mortality did not differ by hospital volume (Q1=35/1059 (3.3%), Q2=30/1063 (2.8%), Q3=33/1120 (2.9%), and Q4=44/1060 (4.2%), p = 0.308). The high volume group had a higher rate of major complication (Q1=14.9%, Q2=12.8%, Q3=13.3%, and Q4=20.1%, adjusted p < 0.001). Physician modified grafts were more frequently employed in high-volume centers (Q1=4.5%, Q2=18.7%, Q3=11.3%, and Q4=19.2%, p < 0.001) with a decreased incidence of any endoleak noted at the end of the procedure (Q1=34.9%, Q2=32.8%, Q3=30.0%, and Q4=29.0%, p = 0.003). In the multivariable analysis, in-hospital mortality was not associated with center volume comparing very low volume to medium and high volume centers (OR [95% CI] vs Q4: Q1 =1.1 [0.6-1.9], Q2 =0.6 [0.4-1.1], and Q3 =0.9 [0.5–1.5], p all >0.05). No significant difference was found in 1-year survival between center-volume groups. Conclusions In-hospital mortality is not associated with procedure volume within centers performing complex endovascular aortic repair. However, complication rates and endoleak may be associated with procedure volume. Long-term outcomes by annualized procedure volume, specifically graft durability and sac expansion, should be investigated.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Center-volume,vascular quality initiative,failure to rescue,fenestrated endovascular aortic repair,outcomes
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要