Closed incision negative pressure therapy use as a strategy to reduce sternal wound infection in identified high-risk patients: A multicentre propensity-matched study.

OBJECTIVE:The premise of this retrospective study was to evaluate the intraoperative use of closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) to help reduce the incidence of postoperative sternal wound infections (SWI) in multimorbid patients with an elevated risk of developing an SWI post cardiac surgery versus a cohort that received standard of care dressings. METHODS:Data of all adult patients were collected from each cardiothoracic surgery units across three hospitals in the United Kingdom. High-risk patients had two or more recognised risk factors. Fisher's exact test (two-tailed) and unpaired t-test helped analyse categorical and continuous data. Propensity matching was performed to compare the two groups. RESULTS:A total of 5,288 patients who had cardiac surgery were included. Propensity matching led to 766 matched cases. There were significantly fewer sternal wound infections in the ciNPT group (43 [5.6%] versus 119 [15.5%] cases; p = 0.0001), as well as fewer deep sternal wound infections (14 [1.8%] versus 31 [4.0%] cases; p = 0.0149) and superficial sternal wound infections (29 [3.8%] versus 88 [11.4%] cases; p = 0.0001). A higher mean length of stay in the ciNPT group was statistically significant (11.23±13 versus 9.66±10 days; p = 0.0083) as well as a significantly higher mean logistic EuroSCORE (11.143±13 versus 8.094±11; p = 0.0001). A statistically significant higher readmission to intensive care due to sternal wound infection was noted for the Control (16 [2.08%] versus 3 [0.39%] readmissions; p = 0.0042). CONCLUSION:ciNPT appears to be an effective intervention to help reduce the incidence of sternal wound infection in high-risk individuals undergoing cardiac surgery.