Outcomes of Distal Third Femur Fractures in Patients 18 Years and Older: A Pilot Study

Gregory R. Roytman,Sahir S. Jabbouri, Jamieson O'Marr, Akshay Raghuram,Brian Beitler, Suhail Irshad, Brianna R. Fram,Brad J. Yoo,Michael P. Leslie,Matthew D. Riedel,Steven M. Tommasini,Daniel H. Wiznia

CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE(2024)

引用 0|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction: The selection of the most optimal fixation method for fractures of the distal femur, whether intramedullary nail (NL), lateral locking plate (PL), or nail/plate (NP) is not always clear. This study retrospectively evaluates surgical patients with distal femur fractures and introduces a pilot study using cluster analysis to identify the most optimal fracture fixation method for a given fracture type. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients 18 years and older with an isolated distal femur fracture who presented to our Level-1 trauma center between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2022, and obtained NL, PL, or NP implants. Patients with polytrauma and those without at least six months of followup were excluded. A chart review was used to obtain demographics, fracture classification, fixation method, and postoperative complications. A cluster analysis was performed. The following factors were used to determine a successful outcome: ambulatory status pre-injury and 6-12 months postoperatively, infection, non -union, mortality, and implant failure. Results: A total of 169 patients met inclusion criteria. No statistically significant association between the fracture classification and fixation type with overall outcome was found. However, patients treated with an NP (n = 14) had a success rate of 92.9% vs only a 68.1% success rate in those treated with a PL (n = 116) (p = 0.106). The most notable findings in the cluster analysis (15 total clusters) included transverse extraarticular fractures demonstrating 100% success if treated with NP (n = 6), 50% success with NL (n=2), and 78.57% success with PL fixation (n=14). NP constructs in complete articular fractures demonstrated success in 100% of patients (n = 5), whereas 77.78% of patients treated with NL (n = 9) and 61.36% of those treated with PL (n = 44). Conclusions: Plate fixation was the predominant fixation method used for distal third femur fractures regardless of fracture classification. However, NP constructs trended towards improved success rates, especially in complete intraarticular and transverse extraarticular fractures, suggesting the potential benefit of additional fixation with these fractures. Cluster analysis provided a heuristic way of creating patient profiles in patients with distal third femur fractures. However, a larger cohort study is needed to corroborate these findings to ultimately develop a clinical decision-making tool that also accounts for patient specific characteristics.
更多
查看译文
关键词
outcome assessment,demography,cluster analysis,dual plate construct,retrograde intramedullary,femoral nail,lateral locking plate,distal femur fractures
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要