Efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin retreatment amongst Guillain–Barré syndrome patients who poorly responded to initial IVIG cycle: a systematic review

Mario B. Prado, Karen Joy B. Adiao, Christian Wilson R. Turalde, Darwin A. Dasig

Acta Neurologica Belgica(2024)

Cited 0|Views1
No score
Abstract
Small cross-sectional studies and case reports observed improvement after administration of second IVIG dose (SID) amongst Guillain–Barré Syndrome (GBS) patients not responsive to initial IVIG cycle. Nevertheless, recent clinical trial and larger observational studies did not find any positive effects of SID. Instead, an increased risk of thromboembolism and mortality was noted. The conclusions of these studies however were not robust as confounding and selection bias were present. Two neurologists conducted the search process (KBA and MBP) using the following terms in Medline: [(“ Guillain-Barré Syndrome”[MeSH Terms] or GBS or Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy or Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy or Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy) AND (Poorly Responsive or Poor Prognosis or Progressive)] AND [(“Intravenous Immunoglobulin”[MeSH Terms] or IVIG or IGIV) AND (second dose or retreatment or SID)]. Only 7 articles were included in this review. In terms of primary outcomes, although the cross-sectional study found improvement in GBS DS score at 4 weeks (Median GBS DS: 3 vs 5, p = 0.033) and the 2 case series observed improvement after SID, no significant differences between the control and intervention groups were found in the cohort [Early SIV OR: 0.7 (95
More
Translated text
Key words
Guillain–Barré syndrome,Second intravenous immunoglobulin dose,IVIG retreatment,Systematic review
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined