Use of the Proboscis Extension Response Assay to Evaluate the Mechanism of House Fly Behavioral Resistance to Imidacloprid

Simple Summary This study investigated the detection and discrimination of the neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid by behaviorally resistant and susceptible house flies (Musca domestica L.). Flies were allowed to contact a sucrose solution containing either a low or a high concentration of imidacloprid with their tarsi alone or with both their tarsi and proboscis. The proboscis extension response (PER) for each house fly was recorded at 0, 2, and 10 s following the start of tarsal contact with the test solution. Following proboscis contact with the sucrose solution containing a high concentration of imidacloprid, behaviorally resistant flies had a significant reduction in PER (within 2 s), while imidacloprid-susceptible flies showed no differences in PER associated with the concentration of imidacloprid. When only the tarsi were allowed to contact either solution, there were no significant differences in PER observed for either fly strain (resistant or susceptible). These results suggest that behaviorally resistant house flies detect imidacloprid and can discriminate among low and high concentrations following proboscis contact but not tarsal contact with a sucrose solution containing imidacloprid. Understanding the mechanisms responsible for behavioral resistance to insecticides by the house fly is critical for creating sustainable pest management strategies for this fly.Abstract The house fly, Musca domestica L., is a significant human and livestock pest. Experiments used female adult house flies glued onto toothpicks for controlled exposure of their tarsi alone (tarsal assay) or their tarsi and proboscis (proboscis assay) with a sucrose solution containing imidacloprid at either a low (10 mu g/mL) or high (4000 mu g/mL) concentration. Proboscis extension response (PER) assays were used to characterize the response of imidacloprid-susceptible and behaviorally resistant house fly strains to contact with sucrose solutions containing either a low or high concentration of imidacloprid. In each assay, 150 female flies from each fly strain were individually exposed to sucrose solutions containing either a low or high concentration of imidacloprid by deliberate contact of the fly tarsi to the test solution. The PER for each fly was subsequently recorded at 0, 2, and 10 s following the initial tarsal contact. A significant and rapid reduction in PER was observed only for the behaviorally resistant fly strain and only following contact by the flies' proboscis with the sucrose solution containing the high imidacloprid concentration. The results suggest that chemoreceptors on the fly labellum or internally on the pharyngeal taste organs are involved in the detection of imidacloprid and discrimination of the concentration, resulting in an avoidance behavior (proboscis retraction) only when imidacloprid is at sufficient concentration. Further research is needed to identify the specific receptor(s) responsible for imidacloprid detection.