Surgical management of secondary acquired cholesteatoma depends on its characteristics

Objective Cholesteatoma secondary to tympanic perforation, known as “secondary acquired cholesteatoma” may progress slower than a retraction pocket cholesteatoma, with less bone destruction and fewer intracranial complications. However, complete surgical removal remains difficult because the pathological epithelium on the marginal side of the extension is not covered by the subepithelial layer of the cholesteatoma matrix, making the boundary with the middle ear mucosa difficult to identify. Therefore, considering the pathophysiology of secondary acquired cholesteatoma, suitable preoperative evaluation and surgical techniques are required. In this study, we aimed to evaluate (i) the extension of secondary acquired cholesteatoma according to the size and location of tympanic membrane perforation; and (ii) the microscopic surgical outcomes, including the rate of residual cholesteatoma, requirement for specialized surgical management, and changes in hearing. Methods This retrospective study included data of cases with secondary acquired cholesteatoma (n = 66; 66 ears of 64 patients, 2 patients had bilateral ear involvement), including those who underwent a staged operation (n = 25). Results The perforation level of the tympanic membrane was associated with the cholesteatoma extension. When the cholesteatoma extended around the stapes, staged operation was chosen. Six cases of spontaneous resolution of stapes lesions at the time of staged surgery were observed. A significant postoperative improvement in hearing was observed; however, five cases experienced sensorineural hearing loss. Conclusion Surgery, including staged surgery of the stapes lesions, along with careful observation of the perforation, is required in secondary acquired cholesteatoma. For lesions that are visible yet challenging to remove, it is imperative to exercise prudent judgment, taking into account the possibility of spontaneous resolution.