Measuring Wellbeing

Gemma Simons, Raymond Effah

The Mental Health of Medical Students(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Abstract To answer how we should measure medical student wellbeing a methodological systematic review that looks at how we have done this until now was conducted. In the 182 studies included in the systematic review operational definitions of wellbeing were not used and this led to heterogeneity. For example, 31.3% of studies while listing wellbeing as either an aim of measurement, or as an intended outcome in the methods, captured a different concept as an outcome in the results section. The outcomes used to measure wellbeing were either positive concepts (52%), negative concepts (42%), or student-specific neutral concepts (6%). Thirty-seven new, untested, outcome measurement instruments were used and 85, previously developed outcome measurement instruments were used, with the GHQ-12 being used most frequently. With an operational definition of wellbeing and a core outcome set with valid, reliable, and practical measurement instruments, medical student wellbeing research could move away from repeatedly measuring what is wrong, but instead identify and develop the contexts and mechanisms that are right.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要