Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilities

Mary Phuong,Matthew Aitchison,Elliot Catt, Sarah Cogan, Alexandre Kaskasoli,Victoria Krakovna, David Lindner,Matthew Rahtz, Yannis Assael, Sarah Hodkinson, Heidi Howard, Tom Lieberum,Ramana Kumar, Maria Abi Raad, Albert Webson, Lewis Ho, Sharon Lin,Sebastian Farquhar,Marcus Hutter,Gregoire Deletang,Anian Ruoss, Seliem El-Sayed, Sasha Brown,Anca Dragan,Rohin Shah,Allan Dafoe,Toby Shevlane

arxiv(2024)

引用 0|浏览11
暂无评分
摘要
To understand the risks posed by a new AI system, we must understand what it can and cannot do. Building on prior work, we introduce a programme of new "dangerous capability" evaluations and pilot them on Gemini 1.0 models. Our evaluations cover four areas: (1) persuasion and deception; (2) cyber-security; (3) self-proliferation; and (4) self-reasoning. We do not find evidence of strong dangerous capabilities in the models we evaluated, but we flag early warning signs. Our goal is to help advance a rigorous science of dangerous capability evaluation, in preparation for future models.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要