Right transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve replacement is comparable to left despite challenges

Daniel McGrath, Hansuh Lee, Charley Sun,Masashi Kawabori,Yong Zhan

General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Transaxillary access is the most popular alternative to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Although left transaxillary access is generally preferred, right transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve replacement could be challenging because of the opposing axillary artery and aortic curvatures, which may warrant procedural modifications to improve alignment. Our aim is to compare our single center’s outcomes for left and right transaxillary access groups and to evaluate procedural modifications for facilitating right transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared for consecutive left or right axillary TAVRs performed from 6/2016 to 6/2022 with SAPIEN 3. The effects of our previously reported “flip-n-flex” technique on procedural efficiency and new conduction disturbances were subanalyzed in the right axillary group. Right and left transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve replacement were performed in 25 (18 with the “flip-n-flex” technique) and 26 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences between patient characteristics or outcomes. Right axillary subanalysis showed the “flip-n-flex” technique group had significantly shorter fluoroscopy times (21.2 ± 6.2 vs 29.6 ± 12.4 min, p = 0.03) and a trend towards less permanent pacemaker implantation (6.3
更多
查看译文
关键词
Alternative access,Transaxillary,Transcatheter aortic valve replacement,Fluoroscopy,Pacemaker
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要