Analysis of Safety and Efficacy of Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Prophylactic, Pre-Emptive and Treatment Strategies Post Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant

Ray Mun Koo, Sarah Ai Ting Tan, Elizabeth O'Flaherty, Mridula Mokoonlall, Katherine Carpena,Zhi Han Yeoh,David S Ritchie

Transplantation and Cellular Therapy(2024)

Cited 0|Views4
No score
Abstract
Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are often used to prevent or treat disease relapse following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). However, patients remain at risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) from DLI or death from progressive disease (PD). We reviewed outcomes in our institution after DLI was administered prophylactically (mixed chimerism), pre-emptively (positive measurable residual disease) or therapeutically (relapsed disease).Between 2015 and 2023, 81 patients received 181 doses of DLI with prophylactic (n=21), pre-emptive (n=16) or therapeutic (n=44) intent. More patients with acute leukaemia received pre-emptive and therapeutic DLI. Majority of patients received reduced intensity conditioned alloSCT. There is also a higher percentage of ATG use in prophylactic group. Patient characteristics were otherwise well matched. Cytoreductive therapy were concurrently utilised in 73% of therapeutic DLI.Median follow up was 383 days (range: 11-2574 days) post DLI. The 1-year overall survival (OS) was 63.5% for the entire cohort, with superior OS seen in the prophylactic and pre-emptive cohort compared to therapeutic cohort (85% vs 100% vs 44%, P=0.001) (Figure 1). The 180-day incidence of grade II-IV GVHD was lower in the therapeutic DLI cohort (22%) compared to prophylactic (54%) and pre-emptive cohorts (70%) (P=0.003, respectively) (Figure 2). The 1-year incidence of relapse, relapse-free survival and GVHD, relapse-free survival in prophylactic and pre-emptive cohorts were similar. The leading cause of death in the entire cohort was PD (n=29, 68%) and occur almost exclusively within the therapeutic DLI cohort (90%). Death from GVHD was 11% across the whole group.In this analysis, PD remains the main cause of treatment failure following DLI. DLI-induced GVHD mortality was low in prophylactic and treatment cohorts. Patients receiving pre-emptive DLI had excellent survival outcomes but high incidence of GVHD, suggesting that the graft-versus-tumour effect remains inseparable from GVHD. Our analysis indicates that DLI is safe, and especially effective with acceptable risk in the pre-emptive group but largely ineffective as currently undertaken in the treatment group. A better salvage option is indicated to improve outcome in the treatment group.
More
Translated text
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined