Learning imaging in axial spondyloarthritis: more than just a matter of experience.

OBJECTIVE:Reliable interpretation of imaging findings is essential for the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and requires a high level of experience. We investigated experience-dependent differences in diagnostic accuracies using X-ray (XR), MRI and CT. METHODS:This post hoc analysis included 163 subjects with low back pain. Eighty-nine patients had axSpA, and 74 patients had other conditions (mechanical, degenerative or non-specific low back pain). Final diagnoses were established by an experienced rheumatologist before the reading sessions. Nine blinded readers (divided into three groups with different levels of experience) scored the XR, CT and MRI of the sacroiliac joints for the presence versus absence of axSpA. Parameters for diagnostic performance were calculated using contingency tables. Differences in diagnostic performance between the reader groups were assessed using the McNemar test. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Fleiss kappa. RESULTS:Diagnostic performance was highest for the most experienced reader group, except for XR. In the inexperienced and semi-experienced group, diagnostic performance was highest for CT&MRI (78.5% and 85.3%, respectively). In the experienced group, MRI showed the highest performance (85.9%). The greatest difference in diagnostic performance was found for MRI between the inexperienced and experienced group (76.1% vs 85.9%, p=0.001). Inter-rater agreement was best for CT in the experienced group with κ=0.87. CONCLUSION:Differences exist in the learnability of the imaging modalities for axSpA diagnosis. MRI requires more experience, while CT is more suitable for inexperienced radiologists. However, diagnosis relies on both clinical and imaging information.