Comparative study of permeation effects between vibrating microneedle and low-frequency sonophoresis systems

Microneedle transdermal administration and low-frequency ultrasound represent two important physical penetration-promoting methods for enhancing drug penetration. This article aims to investigate and compare the effects of drug penetration enhancement through transdermal administration using vibrating microneedles versus low-frequency sonophoresis. In Vitro permeation studies were conducted using Valia-Chien double chamber diffusion cells to evaluate the transdermal delivery of tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride (TMPH). The TMPH concentration in the receiving compartment was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Several combinations of microneedles and ultrasound settings were investigated, including different needle heights, vibration frequencies, exposure times, and assorted distances of ultrasound horn and skin. The results revealed the vibrating microneedle system as the most efficacious treatment to increase the TMPH permeability into the rat skin. The combination of a larger needle, higher frequency, and a 3-min exposure led to a 41.92-fold increase in cumulative permeability compared to the control group. The ultrasound treatment exhibited a moderate enhancement effect on TMPH skin penetration. Using a horn-to-skin distance of 3 mm and a 3-min exposure resulted in a 4.34-fold increase in TMPH cumulative permeation compared to the control group. It could be concluded that while both the vibrating microneedle and the low-frequency ultrasound systems act as penetration enhancers for promoting the TMPH permeation through the skin, the vibrating microneedle system notably demonstrates a more effective penetration-promoting effect. System illustrations and permeation effects between vibrating microneedle and low-frequency sonophoresis systems.