Benefits of First Pass Recanalization in Basilar Strokes Based on Initial Clinical Severity

Vincent Brissette,Danielle Carole Roy, Mobin Jamal, Maria Fahmy,Adrien Guenego, Joud Fahed,Michel Shamy,Dar Dowlatshahi,Robert Fahed

Clinical Neuroradiology(2024)

Cited 0|Views10
No score
Abstract
Randomized trials demonstrating the benefits of thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusions have enrolled an insufficient number of patients with a National Institutes for Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score < 10 and shown discrepant results for patients with an NIHSS > 20. Achieving a first pass recanalization (FPR) improves clinical outcomes in stroke. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the FPR on outcomes among basilar artery occlusion patients, characterized by prethrombectomy initial NIHSS score. We retrospectively analyzed the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry of 279 basilar artery occlusion patients treated with thrombectomy from 6 participating centers. We compared the 90-day clinical outcomes of achieving a FPR versus no FPR, categorized by initial clinical severity: mild (NIHSS < 10), moderate (NIHSS 10–20) and severe (NIHSS > 20). We used Poisson regression with robust error variance to determine the effect of the NIHSS score on the association between FPR and outcomes. The FPR patients with NIHSS < 10 or NIHSS 10–20 were more likely to have a favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale, mRS 0–3) than non-FPR patients (relative risk, RR = 1.32, 95
More
Translated text
Key words
First pass recanalization,First pass effect,Thrombectomy,Basilar stroke,Mortality,Clinical outcome
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined