Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma (SEF) versus Low Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma (LGFMS): Presentation and outcome in the nationwide NETSARC plus series of 330 patients over 13 years

J. Y. Blay, C. Tlemsani, M. Toulmonde, A. Italiano, M. Rios, E. Bompas, T. Valentin, F. Duffaud,L. R. Le Nail, S. Watson, N. Firmin, P. Dubray-Longeras, M. Ropars, C. Perrin, A. Hervieu, C. Lebbe, E. Saada-Bouzid, P. Soibinet, F. Fiorenza, F. Bertucci,P. Boudou,G. Vaz, S. Bonvalot,C. Honore, P. Marec-Berard, V. Minard,M. Cleirec, D. Biau, P. Meeus,A. Babinet, V. Dumaine, S. Carriere,M. Fau, G. Decanter,F. Gouin, C. Ngo, F. Le Loarer, M. Karanian,A. Meurgey, A. Dufresne, M. Brahmi,C. Chemin-Airiau,F. Ducimetiere, N. Penel,A. Le Cesne

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER(2024)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma (SEF) and Low Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma (LGFMS) are ultrarare sarcomas sharing common translocations whose natural history are not well known. We report on the nationwide exhaustive series of 330 patients with SEF or LGFMS in NETSARC+ since 2010.Patients and methods: NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTB). Since 2010, (i) pathological review has been mandatory for sarcoma, and (ii) tumour/patients' characteristics have been collected in the NETSARC+ nationwide database. The characteristics of patients with SEF and LGFMS and their outcome are compared.Results: 35/73 (48%) and 125/257(49%) of patients with SEF and LGFMS were female. More visceral, bone and trunk primary sites were observed in SEF (p < 0.001). 30% of SEF vs 4% of LGFMS patients had metastasis at diagnosis (p < 0.0001). Median size of the primary tumor was 51 mm (range 10-90) for LGFMS vs 80 (20-320) for SEF (p < 0.001). Median age for LGFMS patients was 12 years younger than that of SEF patients (43 [range 4-98] vs 55 [range 10-91], p < 0.001). Neoadjuvant treatment was more often given to SEF (16% vs 9%, p = 0.05). More patients with LGFMS were operated first in reference centers (51% vs 26%, p < 0.001). The R0 rate on the operative specimen was 41% in LGFMS vs 16% in SEF (p < 0.001). Median event-free survival (EFS) of patients with SEF and LGFMS were 32 vs 136 months (p < 0.0001). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Fifty-months OS was 93% vs 81% for LGFMS vs SEF (p = 0.05). Median OS was 77 months after first relapse, similar for SEF and LGFMS.In multivariate analysis, age, tumor size, metastasis at diagnosis were independent prognostic factors for OS in LGFMS.Conclusions: Although sharing close molecular alterations, SEF and LGFMS have a different natural history, clinical presentation and outcome, with a higher risk of metastatic relapse in SEF. Survival after relapse is longer than with other sarcomas, and similar for SEF and LGFMS.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Low grade fibromyxoid sarcoma,Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma,Sarcoma,Rare cancers,Guidelines,Survival,Reference centers
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要