Feasibility of post-exposure-prophylaxis with single-dose rifampicin and identification of high prevalent clusters in villages' hyperendemic for leprosy in Senegal

Gilbert Batista,Pauline Diousse, Papa Mamadou Diagne, Mahamat Cisse, Ibrahima Tito Tamba, Fatou Diop, Fanta Diop, Lahla Fall, Diama Sakho,Mariama Bammo,Ndiaga Gueye,Christa Kasang,Nimer Ortuno-Gutierrez, Louis Hyacinthe Zoubi

PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES(2024)

引用 0|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction Senegal is a leprosy low-endemic country with nine villages known to be hyperendemic with a leprosy incidence rate above 1,000 per million inhabitants. We aim to implement a door-to-door screening strategy associated with the administration of a single-dose-rifampicin (SDR) as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to household and social contacts in these villages and to identify spatial clustering and assess the risk of leprosy in population according to the physical distance to the nearest index-case.Methods From October/2020 to February/2022 active door-to-door screening for leprosy was conducted in nine villages. Using an open-source application, we recorded screening results, demographic and geographic coordinate's data. Using Poisson model we analysed clustering and estimated risk of contracting leprosy in contacts according to the distance to the nearest new leprosy patient.Results In nine villages, among 9086 contacts listed, we examined 7115. Among 6554 eligible contacts, 97.8% took SDR. We found 39(0.64%) new leprosy cases among 6,124 examined in six villages. Among new cases, 21(53.8%) were children, 10(25.6%) were multibacillary and 05(12.8%) had grade 2 disability. The prevalent risk ratio and 95% confidence intervale(95%CI) adjusted by village were 4.2(95%CI 1.7-10.1), 0.97(95%CI 0.2-4.4), 0.87(95%CI 0.2-25), 0.89(95%CI 0.3-2.6) and 0.70(95%CI 0.2-2.5) for the contacts living in the same household of an index case, 1-25m, 26-50m, 51-75m and 76-100m compared to those living at more than 100m respectively. We identified nine high prevalent clusters including 27/39(69%) of new cases in 490/7,850(6%) inhabitants, with relative risks of 46.6(p-value = 0.01), and 7.3, 42.8, 8.2, 12.5, 11.4, 23.5, 22.3, and 14.6 (non-significant p-values).Conclusions Our strategy has proved the feasibility of active screening for leprosy in contacts and the introduction of PEP for leprosy under programmatic conditions. Only individuals living in the same household as the leprosy patient had a significant risk of contracting leprosy. We documented nine clusters of leprosy that could benefit from tailored control activities while optimizing resources. Senegal has nine Social Rehabilitation Villages (VRS) which were established in March 1976. These are former leprosaria converted into villages and are known for their high leprosy transmission. To improve screening and reduce transmission of the disease, we implemented from October 2020 to February 2022, an active leprosy screening strategy associated with the administration of a single dose of rifampicin (SDR) as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to household and social contacts in these VRS. This operational research study showed that the strategy was feasible under programmatic conditions with 7115(98.6%) people accepting the test among 7219 present and 6408(97.8%) people accepting and taking SDR among 6554 eligible. We found 39 new cases in six VRS among 6,121 examined. The geographical coordinates of the households were also entered using the adapted 'Open Data Kit' (ODK) application, which allowed the identification of nine highly prevalent clusters including 27/39 (69%) of new cases in 490/7,850 (6%) inhabitants in five VRS with cases detected. Our results can be used to guide targeted and more efficient active case finding.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要