Validation of the Apnealink Air for Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) in Pregnant Women in Early-Mid Gestation.

PURPOSE:The detection of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in pregnant women in early-mid gestation is logistically difficult. Accurate alternates to polysomnography (PSG) in early pregnancy are not well identified. We compared the agreement between Apnealink Air (AL) and existing screening questionnaires to PSG in pregnant women ≤ 24-week gestation. METHODS:Pregnant women (≤ 24-week gestation) underwent AL at home plus attended PSG in any order, completed within 7 days where practicable. AL was manually scored (AL(M)) and automatically scored (AL(A)). An apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 was considered diagnostic of OSA and an AHI ≥ 15 considered at least moderate OSA. Diagnostic analysis was undertaken (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV)) by generating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and an area under the curve (AUC) (95% CI). Bland-Altman plots were used to plot agreement. Screening questionnaires (Epworth sleepiness score (ESS), STOP-BANG, calculated pregnancy-specific screening tool) were compared to PSG. RESULTS:A total of 49 participants successfully completed both tests at around 14-weeks gestation (IQR 12.9, 17.1). The time interval between AL and PSG was a median of 2 days (IQR 1, 5 (range 1-11)). A total of 14 (29%) participants had OSA. The median AHI of AL(A) (3.1(IQR 0.85,4.6)) and AL(M) (IQR2.4(0.65,4.8)) did not differ from PSG (1.7(IQR1.0,6.1)). AL(A) and AL(M) compared to PSG demonstrated diagnostic test accuracy (area under curve (ROC)) of 0.94(95% CI 0.87-1.0) and 0.92(95% CI 0.85-1.0) respectively. Apnealink Air outperformed screening questionnaires tested. CONCLUSION:The findings suggest that Apnealink may provide a substitute to attended PSG identification of OSA in pregnant women in early-mid gestation using both manual and auto-scoring methods.