No differences in long-term clinical outcomes and survival rate of navigation-assisted versus conventional primary mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: A minimum 10-year follow-up

PurposeThis study aimed to compare long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes and survival rates between navigation-assisted (NAV) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and conventional (CON) TKA using a mobile-bearing insert.MethodsFrom May 2008 to December 2009, 45 and 63 mobile-bearing TKA patients were enroled in the CON- and NAV-TKA groups with 146.8 months follow-up, respectively. Clinical outcomes (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index and Knee Society Scores), radiographic outcomes (hip-knee-ankle [HKA], lateral distal femoral, medial proximal tibial, gamma, and delta angles), and survivorship were compared between both groups.ResultsThe number of HKA angle outliers (more than 3 degrees or less than -3 degree) was significantly lower in the NAV-TKA group (24.4% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.036) than in the CON-TKA group. However, long-term clinical outcomes were similar between both groups. The cumulative survival rate (best-case scenario) was 98.3% in the CON-TKA group and 97.5% in the NAV-TKA group, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.883).ConclusionLong-term clinical outcomes and survival rates were similar between the two groups despite fewer outliers of postoperative lower-limb alignment in the NAV-TKA group. Excellent survival rates were observed in both groups using mobile-bearing inserts.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, case series.