Coronary perforation occurring during percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with persistent high inpatient mortality and complications

Background: Coronary perforation is one of the major complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The goal of this study was to evaluate adverse outcomes and mortality in patients suffering from coronary perforation during PCI above the age of 30. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, years 2016-2020, was studied using ICD 10 codes. Patients suffering from perforation were compared to patients without perforation during PCI. Results: PCI was performed in a weighted total of 10,059,269 patients. Coronary perforation occurred in 11,725 (0.12 %) of all PCI performed. The mortality rate of patients with perforations was very high in comparison to patients without perforations. (12.9% vs 2.5%, OR: 5.6, CI:5-6.3 p<0.001). Furthermore, patients with coronary perforations had much higher rates of urgent coronary bypass surgery, tamponade, cardiac arrest, and major cardiovascular outcomes. Mortality remained high and over 10% in the 5-year study period. Conclusion: Using a large national inpatient database, all-cause inpatient mortality in patients with coronary perforation is very high (over 10%) with persistently high mortality rates over the years study suggesting that treatment of perforations needs further improvement. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Clinical Trial N/A ### Funding Statement None ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: NIS data base publically available without patient identifier exempt from IRB I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes NIS database publically available