Correction to: Optimizing non‑invasive preimplantation genetic testing: investigating culture conditions, sample collection, and IVF treatment for improved non‑invasive PGT‑A results

Purpose This study aimed to optimize the non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT-A) in the laboratory by comparing two collection timing of the spent culture medium (SCM), two embryo rinsing protocols, and the use of conventional insemination instead of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Methods Results of two embryo rinsing methods (one-step vs sequential) and SCM collected on day 5 vs day 6 after retrieval were compared against trophectoderm (TE) biopsies as reference. Results from day 6 SCM in cycles fertilized by conventional insemination were compared with PGT-A using ICSI. Results The rate of concordance was higher in day 6 samples than in day 5 samples when the sequential method was used, in terms of total concordance (TC; day 6 vs day 5: 85.0% vs 60.0%, p = 0.0228), total concordance with same sex (TCS, 82.5% vs 28,0%, p < 0.0001), and full concordance with same sex (FCS, 62.5% vs 24.0%, p = 0.0025). The sequential method significantly out-performed the one-step method when SCM were collected on day 6 (sequential vs one-step, TC: 85.0% vs 64.5%, p = 0.0449; TCS: 82.5% vs 54.8%, p = 0.0113; FCS: 62.5% vs 25.8%, p = 0.0021). There was no significant difference in niPGT-A results between cycles fertilized by the conventional insemination and ICSI. Conclusion We have shown a higher concordance rate when SCM was collected on day 6 and the embryos were rinsed in a sequential manner. Comparable results of niPGT-A when oocytes were fertilized by conventional insemination or ICSI. These optimization steps are important prior to commencement of a randomized trial in niPGT-A.