Comparing family-based treatment with inpatient treatment in youth with anorexia nervosa eligible for hospitalization: A 12-month feasibility study

Objective: Family-based treatment (FBT) for youth with anorexia nervosa (AN), has not been compared to inpatient, multimodal treatment (IMT).
Method: Prospective, non-randomized pilot feasibility study of adolescents with AN receiving FBT (n = 31), and as a reference point for exploratory outcome comparisons IMT (n = 31), matched for baseline age and percent median BMI (%mBMI). Feasibility of FBT in youth fulfilling criteria for IMT was assessed via study recruitment and retention rates; acceptability via drop-out and caregiver strain; safety via adverse events; preliminary treatment effectiveness between groups was assessed via a change in %mBMI, AN psychopathology (Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire, EDE-Q), and hospital days, over 12 months with intent-to-treat, mixed models repeated measures analyses covering post-intervention usual care until 12 months.
Results: Taking into account that 8 FBT patients (25.8%) crossed over to IMT due to lack of weight gain or psychiatric concerns, FBT and IMT were similarly feasible, acceptable, and safe, apart from more physical antagonism toward others in FBT (p = .010). FBT lasted longer (median [interquartile range, IQR]; 33.6 [17.4, 49.9] vs. 17.3 [14.4, 24] weeks, p < .001), but required fewer hospital days than IMT (median, [IQR], FBT = 1 [0, 16] vs. IMT = 123 [101, 180], p < .001). Baseline comorbidity-adjusted changes over 12 months did not differ between groups in %mBMI (FBT = 12.6 +/- 11.9 vs. IMT = 13.7 +/- 9.1; p = .702) and EDE-Q global score (median, [IQR]; FBT = -1.2 [-2.3, 0.2] vs. IMT = -1.3 [-2.8, -0.4]; p = .733).
Discussion: Implementing FBT in this pilot study was feasible, acceptable, and safe for youth eligible for IMT according to German S3 guidelines. Non-inferiority of FBT versus IMT requires confirmation in a sufficiently large multicenter RCT.