Comparing flow-based and anatomy-based features in the data-driven study of nasal pathologies

FLOW(2024)

Cited 0|Views2
No score
Abstract
In several problems involving fluid flows, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) provides detailed quantitative information and allows the designer to successfully optimize the system by minimizing a cost function. Sometimes, however, one cannot improve the system with CFD alone, because a suitable cost function is not readily available; one notable example is diagnosis in medicine. The application considered here belongs to the field of rhinology; a correct air flow is key for the functioning of the human nose, yet the notion of a functionally normal nose is not available and a cost function cannot be written. An alternative and attractive pathway to diagnosis and surgery planning is offered by data-driven methods. In this work, we consider the machine learning study of nasal impairment caused by anatomic malformations, with the aim of understanding whether fluid dynamic features, available after a CFD analysis, are more effective than purely geometric features at the training of a neural network for regression. Our experiments are carried out on an extremely simplified anatomic model and a correspondingly simple CFD approach; nevertheless, they show that flow-based features perform better than geometry-based ones and allow the training of a neural network with fewer inputs, a crucial advantage in fields like medicine.
More
Translated text
Key words
Nasal cavities,Computational fluid dynamics,Dimensionality reduction,Functional maps
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined