Comparative study between dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging and arterial spin labelling perfusion in differentiating low-grade from high-grade brain tumours.

Purpose:Our aim was to distinguish between low-grade and high-grade brain tumours on the basis of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) perfusion and arterial spin labelling (ASL) perfusion and to compare DSC and ASL techniques. Material and methods:Forty-one patients with brain tumours were evaluated by 3-Tesla MRI. Conventional and perfusion MRI imaging with a 3D pseudo-continuous ASL (PCASL) and DSC perfusion maps were evaluated. Three ROIs were placed to obtain cerebral blood value (CBV) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) in areas of maximum perfusion in brain tumour and normal grey matter. Histopathological diagnosis was considered as the reference. ROC analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance and to obtain a feasible cut-off value of perfusion parameters to differentiate low-grade and high-grade brain tumours. Results:Normalised perfusion parameters with grey matter (rCBF or rCBV lesion/NGM) of malignant lesions were significantly higher than those of benign lesions in both DSC (normalised rCBF of 2.16 and normalised rCBV of 2.63) and ASL (normalised rCBF of 2.22) perfusion imaging. The normalised cut-off values of DSC (rCBF of 1.1 and rCBV of 1.4) and ASL (rCBF of 1.3) showed similar specificity and near similar sensitivity in distinguishing low-grade and high-grade brain tumours. Conclusions:Quantitative analysis of perfusion parameters obtained by both DSC and ASL perfusion techniques can be reliably used to distinguish low-grade and high-grade brain tumours. Normalisation of these values by grey matter gives us more reliable parameters, eliminating the different technical parameters involved in both the techniques.