Changes in clinical and immunological characteristics according to the various criteria for tissue eosinophilia in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp

Several criteria exist for classifying chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) as eosinophilic or non-eosinophilic. This study attempted to evaluate several criteria for defining eosinophilic CRSwNP from clinical and immunological perspectives.A cohort of 84 patients (73 patients with CRSwNP and 11 control patients) was retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic CRSwNP based on four different criteria: eosinophils (EOS) accounting for more than 20% of the total inflammatory cells; ≥70 EOS per high-power field (HPF); >55 EOS/HPF; and ≥10 EOS/HPF. Preoperative clinical characteristics, the immunological profiles of 14 cytokines from nasal tissue, and postoperative outcomes were compared between eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic CRSwNP based on each criterion. These criteria were immunologically validated by using 14 cytokines to predict the performance of tissue eosinophilia with a random forest model.Patients with eosinophilic CRSwNP were significantly older when the criterion of ≥10 EOS/HPF or EOS >20% was used. The number of patients with aspirin intolerance was significantly higher in eosinophilic CRSwNP based on the criterion of EOS >20%. From an immunological perspective, non-type 2 inflammatory cytokines were significantly higher in non-eosinophilic CRSwNP with the criterion of EOS >20% of the total inflammatory cells. In addition, the criterion of EOS >20% of the total inflammatory cells resulted in the best prediction of eosinophilic CRSwNP, with an accuracy of 88.10% and area under the curve of 0.94.Clinical and immunological characteristics were different between eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic CRSwNP depending on a variety of criteria, and the.of this study should be taken into account when choosing the criterion for defining eosinophilic CRSwNP and interpreting the data accordingly.