Caught on the Crossfire: Biodiversity Conservation Paradox of Sociopolitical Conflict

Bona Abigail Hilario-Husain, Santiago Guerrero,Krizler Cejuela Tanalgo,Francisco Garcı́a, Tessie Lerios, M. R. Garcia,Renee Jane Alvaro-Ele,Meriam Manampan-Rubio, Steven N. Murray, José Antonio Muñoz Reyes,Kier Celestial Dela Cruz,Sumaira Abdullah, Sheila Mae Prince Balase,Jeaneth Magelen Respicio,Asraf Lidasan, Zafrullah Buday,Lothy F. Casim,Ma. Teodora Cabasan, Jonald Pimentel, Florie Jane Tamon,Angelo Rellama Agduma

Research Square (Research Square)(2023)

Cited 0|Views0
No score
Abstract
Biodiversity loss is a growing concern globally, but there’s a lack of knowledge on where to focus conservation efforts. It is therefore essential to determine priorities and barriers to biodiversity knowledge generation. In this context, we present evidence from the Philippines on how sociopolitical instability drives biodiversity shortfall. Our study showed that conflict leads to fewer biodiversity records, with low-conflict areas having higher turnover by more than 50%. Further, tree cover loss is lower in high-conflict areas. Security risks due to sociopolitical conflicts can significantly affect biodiversity recording efforts, potentially leading to underestimating species diversity in these regions. This study highlights the link between conflicts and biodiversity shortfalls, and the negative impact on biodiversity documentation efforts. While rare positive consequences exist, they are incidental and overall negative. Addressing the convergence of conflict, extremism, and biodiversity conservation is crucial for safeguarding ecosystems and human and nature's well-being.
More
Translated text
Key words
biodiversity conservation paradox,conflict,crossfire
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined